Skip to main content

Hillary is in Jungian terms a doppelganger - that is, she is a Shadow agent of a "positive" charge and the positive charge in this element is Bill Clinton. The Shadow is always "'anti-Power' Power"; - it takes its thrill in opposition whereas the original (Bill) opposed as well but with its own organic light: those who liked Bill liked him because he brought a unique new perspective to the world which had the secondary aspect of pissing people off who were not of his winning team - those who like Hillary like her merely because she pisses people off. Although she suggests the original force of her husband, she does not possess it herself; - she possesses its Shadow. Like Madame Mao. Like Yoko Ono. Hillary and her supporters are part of the "collective Shadow" of the Democratic Party - and Bill now manifests that Shadow. Lying and deception are part of the Shadow's "truth" and its aspiring artfulness. The Shadow is not necessarily evil in itself, it is the trailing end of a powerful force. Nixon was the Shadow of Eisenhower; Boy George is the Shadow of Reagan. Hillary is the Shadow of Bill. In politics, it always ends badly with the Shadow. See, George Clooney in Michael Clayton:

"I am Shiva, the god of Death."

I believe the Democratic Party opened up to its Shadow (Dark Side, a better phrase, and eloquently explained in Star Wars) when Bill Clinton had the affair with Monica Lewinsky – Bill was expressing his personal Shadow, as he had always done. Likely, in Myers-Briggs terms, Bill’s Shadow was made up of the parts of his personality that were/are not expressed in his everyday life and work and were repressed. But what is important here is how this behavior was responded to in his group. Bill’s status went up in a certain part of his age and generation group during the affair (my age as well). He became a folk hero. They felt it was cool and nihilistic and anti-establishment to have oral sex in the Oval Office (and in the generation’s academic venue, the nihilist fashion might have left Marx behind, but Jean Genet who proposed sexual domination of police officers was within the same idiom). When the generation – followed by the rest of the Party - rose to Bill defense in that scandal it entered its Shadow.

From then till now, the Clintons have constantly put the Democrats in the position of defending the indefensible. A President takes a one million dollar bribe to let a lobbyist out of jail? Not a problem. A President makes $109 million giving speeches, trading on his office. Democrats willingly pay. A former President race-baits in New Hampshire and South Carolina? Sends thugs out to draw racist crowds in PA and the rooster-fighting contingency in Appalachia?  

I believe this is a good thing in the long run. The Democratic Party is slipping its skin. It is casting off its Shadow. A new party is growing. In my observation, it began with people like Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, Mark Warner of Virginia, Senator Jim Webb of Virginia and Governor John Lynch here in New Hampshire. They are a new breed of Democrat and not particularly beholding to the Clintons. Barack and Michelle have since become the catalyst and are awakening this new talent into an actual new movement. And further, the new generation – the all-important fourth post-war generation – is clearly behind Obama.

I’ve been considering for the last few years that our political condition today and in the last three generations in certain ways resembles the political world of the mid-1800s. We have divided into red and blue America in a very modest extension or reenactment of a cultural conflict ("culture wars") that rent us asunder 150 years ago. Today’s circumstances are different: Today we are losing our North/South paradigm entirely and entering into an East/West paradigm. This will take us further and the other was merely prelude.

But we grow into our political and personal character in the same way as conflict rises within us and we grow and mature with those conflicts. The Clinton/Obama conflict today most resembles the disturbance in the Whig Party in the 1800s. The Whigs had become effete, insular, out-of-touch and obsolete. They were cast off and reformulated as the new Republican Party, featuring Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant. We are experiencing today the same casting aside – casting aside an old skin; the Clinton formulation – for a new day ahead and a new century with Barack and Michelle.

This may be painful now but consider that the Republicans have no such action. They could well be finished as a party if they don’t experience these conflicts as they are necessary growing pains. If so, the Obama Democrats will begin a providential and historic ride as Grant’s liberal Republicans did for almost 100 years.

Originally posted to Bernie Quigley on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:05 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I hate Jung! eoc (0+ / 0-)

    Jesus ain't comin', go ahead and put the Nukes back now.

    by RisingTide on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:09:30 AM PDT

  •  Nixon was a shadow figure for our country, too (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    True North, Fonsia

    and Hillary Clinton has quite a bit in common with him.

  •  Well, OK (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    True North, Fonsia, Neon Vincent

    Not sure about the idea that HRC is Bill's Shadow (vs, in his shadow).  What caught my attention is the suggestion that the Democratic Party is "casting off its Shadow".  That doesn't fit with my understanding of Jung.  Your Shadow is with you always.  Denying it just makes it stronger.

    Controlling the Shadow,  incorporating it into yourself to form a being that is the stronger for it,  that I can agree to.

    For those who can't make their way through Jung's writings, I suggest Ursula K Leguin's A Wizard of Earthsea.   It's enjoyable, and it doesn't make your brain hurt.

    I am become Man, the destroyer of worlds

    by tle on Mon May 05, 2008 at 10:31:23 AM PDT

  •  Hillary as the party's shadow side (0+ / 0-)

    Interesting analysis, but, like tle, I'm not sure Hillary is Bill's shadow.  

    If anything, Hillary represents the "dark side" of the democratic party, the cynical, manipulative, undemocratic, authoritarian, ambitious, power hungry elements that we like to believe exists only in the Republican party.

    This struggle between Clinton and Obama is not just a personal drama, but a fight for the soul of the democratic party.

    tle is right, as much as we'd like to purge the Clintonistas from the party, Jung tells us we need to acknowledge that those elements exist within the party, and instead of diowning them, claim them and transform them into their positive manifestations.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site